Serveur d'exploration sur le patient édenté

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Influence of bone density on implant stability parameters and implant success: a retrospective clinical study

Identifieur interne : 005F74 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 005F73; suivant : 005F75

Influence of bone density on implant stability parameters and implant success: a retrospective clinical study

Auteurs : Ilser Turkyilmaz [États-Unis] ; Edwin A. Mcglumphy [États-Unis]

Source :

RBID : PMC:2614413

Abstract

Background

The aim of the present clinical study was to determine the local bone density in dental implant recipient sites using computerized tomography (CT) and to investigate the influence of local bone density on implant stability parameters and implant success.

Methods

A total of 300 implants were placed in 111 patients between 2003 and 2005. The bone density in each implant recipient site was determined using CT. Insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis were used as implant stability parameters. The peak insertion torque values were recorded with OsseoCare machine. The resonance frequency analysis measurements were performed with Osstell instrument immediately after implant placement, 6, and 12 months later.

Results

Of 300 implants placed, 20 were lost, meaning a survival rate of %. 93.3 after three years (average 3.7 ± 0.7 years). The mean bone density, insertion torque and RFA recordings of all 300 implants were 620 ± 251 HU, 36.1 ± 8 Ncm, and 65.7 ± 9 ISQ at implant placement respectively; which indicated statistically significant correlations between bone density and insertion torque values (p < 0.001), bone density and ISQ values (p < 0.001), and insertion torque and ISQ values (p < 0.001). The mean bone density, insertion torque and RFA values were 645 ± 240 HU, 37.2 ± 7 Ncm, and 67.1 ± 7 ISQ for 280 successful implants at implant placement, while corresponding values were 267 ± 47 HU, 21.8 ± 4 Ncm, and 46.5 ± 4 ISQ for 20 failed implants; which indicated statistically significant differences for each parameter (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

CT is a useful tool to determine the bone density in the implant recipient sites, and the local bone density has a prevailing influence on primary implant stability, which is an important determinant for implant success.


Url:
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6831-8-32
PubMed: 19025637
PubMed Central: 2614413


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Influence of bone density on implant stability parameters and implant success: a retrospective clinical study</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Turkyilmaz, Ilser" sort="Turkyilmaz, Ilser" uniqKey="Turkyilmaz I" first="Ilser" last="Turkyilmaz">Ilser Turkyilmaz</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<nlm:aff id="I1">Department of Prosthodontics, Dental School at San Antonio, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA</nlm:aff>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, Dental School at San Antonio, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Texas</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Mcglumphy, Edwin A" sort="Mcglumphy, Edwin A" uniqKey="Mcglumphy E" first="Edwin A" last="Mcglumphy">Edwin A. Mcglumphy</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<nlm:aff id="I2">Department of Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, the Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA</nlm:aff>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, the Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Ohio</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno>
<idno type="pmid">19025637</idno>
<idno type="pmc">2614413</idno>
<idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2614413</idno>
<idno type="RBID">PMC:2614413</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1186/1472-6831-8-32</idno>
<date when="2008">2008</date>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">001847</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">001847</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">001847</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Curation">001847</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Checkpoint">002629</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Checkpoint">002629</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">002476</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">002476</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">002476</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">006049</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">005F74</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">005F74</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Influence of bone density on implant stability parameters and implant success: a retrospective clinical study</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Turkyilmaz, Ilser" sort="Turkyilmaz, Ilser" uniqKey="Turkyilmaz I" first="Ilser" last="Turkyilmaz">Ilser Turkyilmaz</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<nlm:aff id="I1">Department of Prosthodontics, Dental School at San Antonio, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA</nlm:aff>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, Dental School at San Antonio, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Texas</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Mcglumphy, Edwin A" sort="Mcglumphy, Edwin A" uniqKey="Mcglumphy E" first="Edwin A" last="Mcglumphy">Edwin A. Mcglumphy</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<nlm:aff id="I2">Department of Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, the Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA</nlm:aff>
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Department of Restorative and Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, the Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Ohio</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">BMC Oral Health</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1472-6831</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2008">2008</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">
<sec>
<title>Background</title>
<p>The aim of the present clinical study was to determine the local bone density in dental implant recipient sites using computerized tomography (CT) and to investigate the influence of local bone density on implant stability parameters and implant success.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="methods">
<title>Methods</title>
<p>A total of 300 implants were placed in 111 patients between 2003 and 2005. The bone density in each implant recipient site was determined using CT. Insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis were used as implant stability parameters. The peak insertion torque values were recorded with OsseoCare machine. The resonance frequency analysis measurements were performed with Osstell instrument immediately after implant placement, 6, and 12 months later.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>Of 300 implants placed, 20 were lost, meaning a survival rate of %. 93.3 after three years (average 3.7 ± 0.7 years). The mean bone density, insertion torque and RFA recordings of all 300 implants were 620 ± 251 HU, 36.1 ± 8 Ncm, and 65.7 ± 9 ISQ at implant placement respectively; which indicated statistically significant correlations between bone density and insertion torque values (p < 0.001), bone density and ISQ values (p < 0.001), and insertion torque and ISQ values (p < 0.001). The mean bone density, insertion torque and RFA values were 645 ± 240 HU, 37.2 ± 7 Ncm, and 67.1 ± 7 ISQ for 280 successful implants at implant placement, while corresponding values were 267 ± 47 HU, 21.8 ± 4 Ncm, and 46.5 ± 4 ISQ for 20 failed implants; which indicated statistically significant differences for each parameter (p < 0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>CT is a useful tool to determine the bone density in the implant recipient sites, and the local bone density has a prevailing influence on primary implant stability, which is an important determinant for implant success.</p>
</sec>
</div>
</front>
<back>
<div1 type="bibliography">
<listBibl>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
<biblStruct></biblStruct>
</listBibl>
</div1>
</back>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>États-Unis</li>
</country>
<region>
<li>Ohio</li>
<li>Texas</li>
</region>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="États-Unis">
<region name="Texas">
<name sortKey="Turkyilmaz, Ilser" sort="Turkyilmaz, Ilser" uniqKey="Turkyilmaz I" first="Ilser" last="Turkyilmaz">Ilser Turkyilmaz</name>
</region>
<name sortKey="Mcglumphy, Edwin A" sort="Mcglumphy, Edwin A" uniqKey="Mcglumphy E" first="Edwin A" last="Mcglumphy">Edwin A. Mcglumphy</name>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 005F74 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 005F74 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Santé
   |area=    EdenteV2
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     PMC:2614413
   |texte=   Influence of bone density on implant stability parameters and implant success: a retrospective clinical study
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:19025637" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Thu Nov 30 15:26:48 2017. Site generation: Tue Mar 8 16:36:20 2022